<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>

		<title>Study Claims Viral Bestseller DAGGERMOUTH is AI-Generated &#8211; chatEMPIRE</title>
		<atom:link href="https://chatempire.ng/forums/thread/study-claims-viral-bestseller-daggermouth-is-ai-generated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>https://chatempire.ng/forums/thread/study-claims-viral-bestseller-daggermouth-is-ai-generated/feed/</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>https://bbpress.org/?v=2.6.14</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>https://chatempire.ng/forums/thread/study-claims-viral-bestseller-daggermouth-is-ai-generated/#post-51647</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Study Claims Viral Bestseller DAGGERMOUTH is AI-Generated]]></title>
					<link>https://chatempire.ng/forums/thread/study-claims-viral-bestseller-daggermouth-is-ai-generated/#post-51647</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>tkc&lt;span class=&quot;bp-verified-badge&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<div>
<p>AI is already everywhere, and readers may not be as good at detecting it as we think we are.</p>
<p>Using AI-detection tool Pangram, researchers from Stony Brook University found that <strong>one in five</strong> of the 14,000 randomly selected Kindle ebooks in their data set contained <strong>more than 25% AI-generated text</strong>.</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Particularly notable is the <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/07/daggermouth-novel-bestseller-ai/688067/" rel="nofollow">finding</a>, per Pangram, that #BookTok’s favorite dark dystopian romance, <em><a title="Buy from Bookshop.org" product-id="B0G52CN5ZR" href="https://www.awin1.com/cread.php?awinmid=92005&amp;awinaffid=258769&amp;pref1=bookriot&amp;pref2=study-claims-viral-bestseller-daggermouth-is-ai-generated&amp;ued=https%3A%2F%2Fbookshop.org%2Fbook%2F9798330520572" target="_blank" nofollow="nofollow" data-title="Daggermouth: A Dark Dystopian Romance (Heart)" data-publisher="H. M. Wolfe" data-releasedate="2025-12-05" data-author="Wolfe, H M" data-ean="9798330520572" data-asin="B0G52CN5ZR" class="rnmg-book" rel="noopener nofollow">Daggermouth</a></em> by H.M. Wolfe, is 60% AI-written.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Because AI-detection </strong>is almost as controversial as AI itself, the researchers also checked books suspected of containing AI text for “rare expressions.”</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>These “rare expressions” are phrases containing five words or more in a particular order that rarely appear in texts written by humans but show up often in those suspected of being AI-generated.</li>
<li><em>Daggermouth</em> contains many such phrases, including multiple sentences that appear word-for-word in self-published ebooks by other authors.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Daggermouth</em> author H.M. Wolfe denied the allegations in a statement her lawyer sent to <em>The Atlantic</em>, noting, “I have been outspoken about my opposition to generative AI and what it’s doing to writers, artists, and the creative community. I don’t believe it belongs in the writing process.”</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Wolfe did not address the question of “rare expressions.”</li>
</ul>
<p>No matter how damning the evidence may appear, it’s important to note that there is not yet a definitive way to prove AI was used to generate a written text.</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The slowness of Wolfe’s publication pace relative to self-published authors with hundreds of books to their name may support her claim that, “the suggestion that I used generative AI to write  <em>Daggermouth</em> is wholly untrue.” </li>
<li>OTOH, an AI expert not affiliated with the study found the researchers’ methods to be sound, stating that it is “almost statistically impossible” for a book that was actually written by humans to trip AI-detection software as 60% AI-generated.</li>
</ul>
<p> The implications of these findings go well beyond concerns about one uber-popular book, as the study also indicated that the 20% of ebooks in Amazon’s catalog found to contain “substantial” AI-generated or -assisted text account for 12% of sales and 10% of bestsellers.</p>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>This is evidence that AI-generated ebooks, now easily produceable for self-publishing at scale, are cannibalizing the market for human-written texts. </li>
</ul>
<p><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f4ca.png?w=780&#038;ssl=1" alt="📊" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;"/> See the data for yourself. Here’s the <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.20349" rel="nofollow">whole study</a> and Will Oremus’s coverage for <em><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/07/daggermouth-novel-bestseller-ai/688067/" rel="nofollow">The Atlantic</a></em>. </p>
</div>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

